Re: A new and better FBS thread
you sound like a politician.. (i say $2-$3 million) you say $2.2 million and $1.5 million for each... that's barely a difference. oh the horror!!
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
you sound like a politician.. (i say $2-$3 million) you say $2.2 million and $1.5 million for each... that's barely a difference. oh the horror!!
$2.2M was the NCAA Tourney share for the entire MAC conference in 2013. Split it 12 ways and that's about $180K per school. That's a big difference. Adding the MAC per school share of the CFP money, NCAA tourney money, and TV money all together is barely over $2M per school. It's not just a coincidence that all those MAC schools are funding over half of their athletic department budget on the backs of student fees and school funds.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professor Chaos
$2.2M was the NCAA Tourney share for the entire MAC conference in 2013. Split it 12 ways and that's about $180K per school. That's a big difference. Adding the MAC per school share of the CFP money, NCAA tourney money, and TV money all together is barely over $2M per school. It's not just a coincidence that all those MAC schools are funding over half of their athletic department budget on the backs of student fees and school funds.
NDSU can raise their dam student fee's.....
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
NDSU can raise their dam student fee's.....
NDSU tried. They said no. Next
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
It'd cost NDSU $8-10 million more per year to move up with all sports. even less with Football Only membership.
college football playoff money = $2-3 million per mwc/mac school
Big Dance money = $2-3 million per school
Tv contract money = $2-3 mllion per school
That jumps NDSU from $20 million budget up to $26-27 million range and right in the middle of the mwc/mac
Lakes, you are a wise tv and media savy mind. You should know its eyeballs, ears and clicks that drive tv and media revenue. considering NDSU gets a million (lets just say) a year in media payments, what conference would take you as they are dilutive to the existing revenue stream.
For example, MWC conference, your math $3 million per team. 10 teams (I know there are more, but this is for example purposes only). League gets $30 million. Add an 11th team. NDSU generates a million in media coverage. You have $31 million divided amongst 11 teams. $2.8 million on average. Good for NDSU, bad for everyone in the league.
So unless you can grow the media pot, no one will be interested. that is why Rutgers is in the Big Ten. The New York City exposure is greater than the payout to Rutgers with their share of the Big 10 deal.
So lets. Football play off money-0
Big Dance money-0
Media/ TV -0
What is your funding answer?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kab1one
Lakes, you are a wise tv and media savy mind. You should know its eyeballs, ears and clicks that drive tv and media revenue. considering NDSU gets a million (lets just say) a year in media payments, what conference would take you as they are dilutive to the existing revenue stream.
For example, MWC conference, your math $3 million per team. 10 teams (I know there are more, but this is for example purposes only). League gets $30 million. Add an 11th team. NDSU generates a million in media coverage. You have $31 million divided amongst 11 teams. $2.8 million on average. Good for NDSU, bad for everyone in the league.
So unless you can grow the media pot, no one will be interested. that is why Rutgers is in the Big Ten. The New York City exposure is greater than the payout to Rutgers with their share of the Big 10 deal.
So lets. Football play off money-0
Big Dance money-0
Media/ TV -0
What is your funding answer?
Beer in the Dome at football games will be my guess.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vet70
Beer in the Dome at football games will be my guess.
Get 5 companies to donate 5 million each. Its easy. He said so. So its gotta be true--right??????
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kab1one
Lakes, you are a wise tv and media savy mind. You should know its eyeballs, ears and clicks that drive tv and media revenue. considering NDSU gets a million (lets just say) a year in media payments, what conference would take you as they are dilutive to the existing revenue stream.
For example, MWC conference, your math $3 million per team. 10 teams (I know there are more, but this is for example purposes only). League gets $30 million. Add an 11th team. NDSU generates a million in media coverage. You have $31 million divided amongst 11 teams. $2.8 million on average. Good for NDSU, bad for everyone in the league.
So unless you can grow the media pot, no one will be interested. that is why Rutgers is in the Big Ten. The New York City exposure is greater than the payout to Rutgers with their share of the Big 10 deal.
So lets. Football play off money-0
Big Dance money-0
Media/ TV -0
What is your funding answer?
kabl1one... you cant say $0 $0 $0. because once youre in a conference you'd be a part of those..
Re: A new and better FBS thread
When do we get a newer and betterer FBS thread?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
EC8CH
When do we get a newer and betterer FBS thread?
No such thing.