Re: A new and better FBS thread
I believe the PAC-12 also needs at least one football only member. I would take the PAC-12 football only invite over the Mountain West football only invite.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KC_Hats
I believe the PAC-12 also needs at least one football only member. I would take the PAC-12 football only invite over the Mountain West football only invite.
Oh yeah, no brainer. No hawaii, AND no utep either
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KC_Hats
I believe the PAC-12 also needs at least one football only member. I would take the PAC-12 football only invite over the Mountain West football only invite.
Could be wrong but I believe it needs to be a full member that has football?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Sacramento state trying to pimp themselves at the beginning of the year about how they’re one of the top programs in FCS. Haven’t heard from them in a while, wonder why that is lmfao
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
Could be wrong but I believe it needs to be a full member that has football?
Correct, you need 8 full members minimum in FBS. PAC currently has 7, MWC will have 8 and might lose more. FB only invites make absolutely no sense. Sorry folks, that ain't happening. Reporters certainly know how to get clicks from the masses though.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Twentysix
This is the kind of thing someone says the day before the invite is announced.
Lol
Hope you are right, maybe I jinxed it in a good way. Just think folks should be prepared for this to take some time, and not melt down if it isn't done quick.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
Correct, you need 8 full members minimum in FBS. PAC currently has 7, MWC will have 8 and might lose more. FB only invites make absolutely no sense. Sorry folks, that ain't happening. Reporters certainly know how to get clicks from the masses though.
For MW it could be football only imo. PAC has only slightly better odds than us joining B12, for a variety of reasons. It will be MW imo. Have been saying for years now that will be our best entry point.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
I have to concur that I absolutely don't know more than anybody else on this board. I am just trying to make sense of all of this..Just like you folks.
Post like you do know more. Everyone else does here.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
What are the requirements during the transition period? Is it 2 years? You probably wouldn't be officially be added until July of 2026 even if you are invited now. Would the transition period start in 26? Does that mean you couldn't be bowl eligible or the conference champ until the 2028 season.
Do you have 2 years to pay the 5 million or is that due on day one in 2026. Do You have 2 years from 06 to provide more scholarships? If you are football only does FBS still require you to add more sports if you don't meet the minimum? Do you have 2 years to do that?
This is all so much different than when Nevada moved up.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
Correct, you need 8 full members minimum in FBS. PAC currently has 7, MWC will have 8 and might lose more. FB only invites make absolutely no sense. Sorry folks, that ain't happening. Reporters certainly know how to get clicks from the masses though.
I believe the MW needs FB only and has stated publicly that that is exactly what they are looking for, so, you know, there’s THAT at least…