Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU1980
I'm sure the usual FCS Forever crowd will always find an excuse for not moving up or not wanting a particular conference when we all know NDSU can't be choosy.
They are probably the exact same crowd that didn't want to go DI.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
Without singling out anybody, the responses to my post about Tarleton St sure show a lot of insecurity. Calling me a troll says everything. They're basically us from 20 years ago. Big difference is low/mid tier FBS learned not to schedule good FCS teams so Tarleton hasn't had a chance to get those wins like we did. I still have no understanding why people here hate on a school that wants to be good.
From the outside of Bisonland looking in, pretending Tarleton is NDSU 20 years ago is laughable. Tarleton isn't in the top 10 pecking order in Texas. Most people in the state have no idea who Tarleton is, or where they are located. I suggest you turn your TV on, watch a home Tarleton game. Very D2 looking team, fanbase, stadium. The fact people tie them to a MWC move is pretty funny. We will see, but I believe the red herring posts long before the post stating the MWC are serious about adding them.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Much like Sam Houston, “tarleton” isn’t even a state bro.
What’s wrong with Texas?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Didn't I say:
Texas St wants PAC.
MWC wants Texas St.
Tarleton was a lever, a pawn: Texas State join us or we'll give that slot to ...
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kevin
Much like Sam Houston, “tarleton” isn’t even a state bro.
But Moorhead is a whole other state.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
I've found this on a few sites but nothing on ESPN, Fox Sports, CBS Sports. I didn't think Bleacher Report was satire.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/...s-20-divisions
Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
Didn't I say:
Texas St wants PAC.
MWC wants Texas St.
Tarleton was a lever, a pawn: Texas State join us or we'll give that slot to ...
That’s all quite possible.
Now Texas St publicly said no to MW though, so guess we will find out what MW’s true plan B is after Texas St.
I *hope* it’s not Tarleton or SHSU. But the conferences sure love to take any program with a heartbeat from Texas. They all want to be there. Will UTEP be enough for MW? Did they promise UTEP a partner?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IndyBison
This is coming, just a matter of how quickly. The P4 do not want to be linked to the rest of the G5 rabble.
It may be whenever this occurs, that will be our real opening to move up.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
Didn't I say:
Texas St wants PAC.
MWC wants Texas St.
Tarleton was a lever, a pawn: Texas State join us or we'll give that slot to ...
No, you were saying that college presidents want students and recruiting and therefore they wanted Tarleton lol