2010 Recruiting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blue

I disagree that the SD media has turned NDSU into the bad guy, don't generalize SD media with SF media. They aren't representative of all of us.:ranting: :mad: :fight::ranting: :mad: :fight:

---

Well I disagree with you. SD Media, the SD university fans here, and the public in general have a dislike for ND and NDSU. Much of it has to do with the a$$ kicking the SD university teams continually received on the football field from NDSU and later UND. The people here also like to poke fun at ND in many ways and its is kind of funny cause it is often like the pot calling the kettle black.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BisonNeil

So, I know Breske is hated pretty well on this board, but he told me from day one that he wanted NDSU to change the way they recruited and that it was an easy sell to Bohl. So, I am convinced that this new approach was Breske's idea, not Bohl's. I don't think the appearance of Breske and the change in recruiting from one year to the next is a coincidence.

Flame on gentlemen, and ladies...

---

I am not surprised that Breske played a role in revamping our recruiting strategy. I do think it is always a little tricky to attribute a big idea to one individual in a group.

Now, can someone explain why our defense appeared to be so disorganized and passive last season?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BisonNeil

I know I am going to catch a lot of hell for telling you all this, but I feel some strange need to do so.

When my buddy Mike Breske got to NDSU we had lunch several weeks in a row while he got accilmated since his family was still back in Laramie. He told me that before spring ball he sat down with Bohl and suggested to him that NDSU change how they were recruiting. Breske said (as close a quote as I can remember) "I told Craig we need to recruit like the big boys in BCS do it", which meant getting more kids in the camps and getting early verbals.

Breske told me Bohl had been thinking along the same lines but hadn't really formalized in his mind how it might be done, but readily agreed they needed to change things up.

So, I know Breske is hated pretty well on this board, but he told me from day one that he wanted NDSU to change the way they recruited and that it was an easy sell to Bohl. So, I am convinced that this new approach was Breske's idea, not Bohl's. I don't think the appearance of Breske and the change in recruiting from one year to the next is a coincidence.

Flame on gentlemen, and ladies...

---

If Bohl had already been thinking along those lines how could it have been Breskes idea?????:confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 56BISON73

If Bohl had already been thinking along those lines how could it have been Breskes idea?????:confused:

---

Because there is a difference between thinking about doing something and actually doing it. Big difference.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BisonNeil

Because there is a difference between thinking about doing something and actually doing it. Big difference.

---

Doesn't mean Bohl didn't have the "idea"...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BisonNeil

Because there is a difference between thinking about doing something and actually doing it. Big difference.

---

Since Breske is gone how is he involved in actually doing it?

But that has nothing to do with the idea thing of which you admitted that it was something Bohl had been thinking about.

Now since you think it was Breskes idea and he implemented this strategy and you are really good buddies with him you go ahead and run with that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 56BISON73

Since Breske is gone how is he involved in actually doing it?

But that has nothing to do with the idea thing of which you admitted that it was something Bohl had been thinking about.

Now since you think it was Breske idea and he implemented this strategy and you are really good buddies with him you go ahead and run with that.

---

I don't think Breske is hated. Now, let's see how we do this fall. If things stay the same, it is all on Bohl. If they get better, Breske may have been partially at fault for the defense. Now, special teams were all Babich's fault.*



*Yes, I said Babich...because nothing could possibly be Bohl's fault.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TransAmBison

I don't think Breske is hated. Now, let's see how we do this fall. If things stay the same, it is all on Bohl. If they get better, Breske may have been partially at fault for the defense. Now, special teams were all Babich's fault.*



*Yes, I said Babich...because nothing could possibly be Bohl's fault.

---

Agreed. I also think the most interesting, and generally overlooked, fact between Bohl and Breske, is Grant Olson's comments about them. He straight up said, "Bohl called me first to tell me they were letting Breske go...". It could be nothing, but it could tell us a lot about the situation as a whole...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TransAmBison

I don't think Breske is hated. Now, let's see how we do this fall. If things stay the same, it is all on Bohl. If they get better, Breske may have been partially at fault for the defense. Now, special teams were all Babich's fault.*



*Yes, I said Babich...because nothing could possibly be Bohl's fault.

---

I dont think he is hated either. The situation just wasnt right for him or the Bison. It happenes. You move on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 56BISON73

I dont think he is hated either. The situation just wasnt right for him or the Bison. It happenes. You move on.

---

Situation not right? After one year? Seriously, that was too early to tell. Given his track record I find it very hard to believe he was the weak link. We will see next season. Just seems funny.