Re: A new and better FBS thread
Current scoreboard:
PAC at 7, must add one more
MWC at 6 full members, must add 2. Rumors of a play for Texas St and UTEP.
We want PAC to take another MWC school, and Texas St/UTEP to say no.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Current scoreboard:
PAC at 7, must add one more
MWC at 6 full members, must add 2. Rumors of a play for Texas St and UTEP.
We want PAC to take another MWC school, and Texas St/UTEP to say no.
We want PAC to take NDSU
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
reformedUNDfan
We want PAC to take NDSU
Sure, guess we can dream another few hours/days about that.
MWC is our realistic path in, if everything falls right.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
AP reporting Utah St and UNLV were the PAC targets, and UNLV might still be in play:
https://apnews.com/article/conferenc...f52f4691cb872c
Re: A new and better FBS thread
I think the funniest part of all this is SJSU promising to not leave the MW lol
Okay thanks we were so worried
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
UNLV going to be gone. There’s no way they stay as things currently sit.
All that’s left to see is does the MW add 2 or add 4 and who they are. This was always the most likely scenario. Can’t fault PAC for kicking the tires on the AAC or MW for trying to hold it together.
Can add from CUSA or FCS. No one else is shipping out west for them at this point.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Pete Thamel
@PeteThamel
·14m
Per sources, UNLV officials are expected to huddle tonight to further evaluate options. They would have committed to the MWC if all eight school were in. Now they've pivoted back to exploring.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Yep, UNLV in play for the last PAC slot.
https://x.com/PeteThamel/status/1838370269091524713
After that, MWC will likely formulate their plan and move next (presuming UNLV leaves).
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
UNLV going to be gone. There’s no way they stay as things currently sit.
All that’s left to see is does the MW add 2 or add 4 and who they are. This was always the most likely scenario. Can’t fault PAC for kicking the tires on the AAC or MW for trying to hold it together.
Can add from CUSA or FCS. No one else is shipping out west for them at this point.
MWC realistically is looking at Texas St, UTEP, NMSU, SHSU, or some set of FCS.
They won't pull from eastern CUSA imo.
If they go FCS, its Dakotas, Big Sky, and Texas schools in play.
Montanas plus xDSU as a package would ideal.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
MWC realistically is looking at Texas St, UTEP, NMSU, SHSU, or some set of FCS.
They won't pull from eastern CUSA imo.
If they go FCS, its Dakotas, Big Sky, and Texas schools in play.
Montanas plus xDSU as a package would ideal.
Why would Texas State leave for the MW? Money not going to be better. Travel not going to be better. Conference footprint not going to be better.
Not a Vikings fan but I assume this is what they feel like. Already resigned to the MW adding only NMSU and UTEP. The universe doesn’t want an FBS NDSU