Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bison Dan
The difference in the budgets is you guys take 10M out the institutional funds to balance your finances and we're half that.
Annually, correct? So the one-time $4M enrollment "bail-out" that he keeps bringing up is not that big a deal in the bigger picture
I'd still like to see a precise number for what fraction of their students are on-line only. That would be interesting
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
EP NDSU Fan
TV will keep the deal for the original members for two years and scalp the new members to keep the time zone content. Future deals will be CUSA level. The part I think you are missing are the exit fees. If the raid happens this year the remaining members need to collect those fees. It could be worth more than their next contract but you still need a conference to collect the exit fees.
The MWC in all my scenarios require the PAC to move first via the 4 corner schools. It’s the only way I see NDSU moving up, but to your last question on why care? It’s FBS and even in the worst version of the MWC it would have better public peer institutions… not Murray St, UNI, SIU, YSU.
Why would the MW add 4 FCS schools? If you are already putting UTEP, then NMSU and Texas State gets the league back to 9.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
Why would the MW add 4 FCS schools? If you are already putting UTEP, then NMSU and Texas State gets the league back to 9.
Access to media and potential students is in Texas' favor.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
Annually, correct? So the one-time $4M enrollment "bail-out" that he keeps bringing up is not that big a deal in the bigger picture
REA does all the ticketing work for UND Athletics (less UND/State staff) and how they're set up (they file Form 990) they have to return operational profits to UND. When you contract someone to do the work, yeah, the funds run through their books first before getting to yours.
UND made their State allocated funds, their budgets, work without a $4.8M bailout. (And I'll plainly add a "this session" because it could change. However I'm thinking NDSU's time in Bismarck this year is a cautionary tale to Armacost when thinking about the 2025-2027 session.)
Online students is directly in line with the primary mission of a university: Education. (Yes, Chapo, education, not football, or hockey. There, I said it.) Dr. Bresciani was horribly myopic on that subject and it's hindering NDSU.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
REA does all the ticketing work for UND Athletics (less UND/State staff) and how they're set up (they file Form 990) they have to return operational profits to UND. When you contract someone to do the work, yeah, the funds run through their books first before getting to yours.
UND made their State allocated funds, their budgets, work without a $4.8M bailout. (And I'll plainly add a "this session" because it could change. However I'm thinking NDSU's time in Bismarck this year is a cautionary tale to Armacost when thinking about the 2025-2027 session.)
Online students is directly in line with the primary mission of a university: Education. (Yes, Chapo, education, not football, or hockey. There, I said it.) Dr. Bresciani was horribly myopic on that subject and it's hindering NDSU.
Online is a fad and as an employer I would be very skeptical of hiring anyone with only online experience. If und is so hip on it why are they building more taxpayer subsidized student housing?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
REA does all the ticketing work for UND Athletics (less UND/State staff) and how they're set up (they file Form 990) they have to return operational profits to UND. When you contract someone to do the work, yeah, the funds run through their books first before getting to yours.
UND made their State allocated funds, their budgets, work without a $4.8M bailout. (And I'll plainly add a "this session" because it could change. However I'm thinking NDSU's time in Bismarck this year is a cautionary tale to Armacost when thinking about the 2025-2027 session.)
Online students is directly in line with the primary mission of a university: Education. (Yes, Chapo, education, not football, or hockey. There, I said it.) Dr. Bresciani was horribly myopic on that subject and it's hindering NDSU.
DUDE!!! Who fucking cares!!! Shut it! UND sucks and we know it.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
Annually, correct? So the one-time $4M enrollment "bail-out" that he keeps bringing up is not that big a deal in the bigger picture
I'd still like to see a precise number for what fraction of their students are on-line only. That would be interesting
This has a lot of data. https://ndus.edu/wp-content/uploads/...ent-Report.pdf
Fall 2022 Numbers
Total Headcount:
- NDSU - 12242
- 9909 full time and 2333 part time
- 10096 undergrad and 2146 post-grad
- UND - 13876
- 8777 full time and 5099 part time
- 9928 undergrad and 3948 post-grad
Delivery Method of instruction
- NDSU
- 11151 on-campus and 758 off-campus
- 1515 hybrid
- 6014 distance education
- UND
- 8457 on-campus and 266 off-campus
- 3041 hybrid
- 9444 distance education
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
Why would the MW add 4 FCS schools? If you are already putting UTEP, then NMSU and Texas State gets the league back to 9.
and NDSU for 10
Re: A new and better FBS thread
That is not impossible..Unlikely, though
