Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CyPanth
Is this symbolic of the part of Bison fans that is most used in their thinking?
Nah, it's been UNDs view for a decade.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
To our resident UND poster, just because UND has 3 current Title IX lawsuits doesn't mean that's normal. The vast majority of schools figure out compliance before courts get involved. NDSU admin isn't perfect but this is one thing they don't really have problems with.
Or they hire attorneys who specialize in Title IX lawsuits to help guide them through the decision-making process and make sure that any and all lawsuits have no validity and are tossed out. Just like everyone against UND has been.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
To our resident UND poster, just because UND has 3 current Title IX lawsuits doesn't mean that's normal.
That is not accurate. All have been dismissed by the courts. UND had it figured out. Others paid lawyers to get it explained to them.
Every Title IX situation is different. Where were they, school X, before adding 22 FB scholarships? Which prong does a school use to comply, for example, as JMU isn't Coastal isn't GSU (YMMV). NDSU has it working under present circumstance. Should changes happen NDSU will have to make it work under those circumstances. Will it be 22? Likely no. Will it be 0? Likely no. But it is a factor in the calculus.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
abc123
Or they hire attorneys who specialize in Title IX lawsuits to help guide them through the decision-making process and make sure that any and all lawsuits have no validity and are tossed out. Just like everyone against UND has been.
That might work for you, but I still prefer not creating the conditions that lead to lawsuits being filed in the first place.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
That might work for you, but I still prefer not creating the conditions that lead to lawsuits being filed in the first place.
You'd rather a budget deficit leading to program cuts not be resolved. Interesting. Is that you Dean Bresciani?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Title IV? Pfft. Talking abut ANY distinction between so-called "Men's" and so-called "Women's" sports is so frustratingly antiquated in this new and improved genderless age we live in. You dinosaurs need to get your minds right! :sigpalm:
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Why are Hitler Youth Board perennial circle jerk topics polluting this thread?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
That might work for you, but I still prefer not creating the conditions that lead to lawsuits being filed in the first place.
You can't control what other people do. That's why you hire experts to help protect you. UND made hard choices to get through their budget issues, the exact same as NDSU is currently doing.
If NDSU hasn't brought in Title IX experts to consult as part of their FBS due diligence then they aren't anywhere near as close to making a move as some people seem to think.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
EC8CH
Why are Hitler Youth Board perennial circle jerk topics polluting this thread?
Because there’s nothing else to do up in El Forko…
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
You'd rather a budget deficit leading to program cuts not be resolved. Interesting. Is that you Dean Bresciani?
What does this have to do with FBS and Title IX at all?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
abc123
You can't control what other people do. That's why you hire experts to help protect you. UND made hard choices to get through their budget issues, the exact same as NDSU is currently doing.
If NDSU hasn't brought in Title IX experts to consult as part of their FBS due diligence then they aren't anywhere near as close to making a move as some people seem to think.
I'm pretty sure NDSU did/will consult Title IX experts whenever they're needed. Please note again that we don't need to spend unlimited taxpayer money to defend against lawsuits. I very much prefer our method of not going to court in the first place.
Also note that both of you are completely avoiding the main point that we do not need 22 women's scholarships if we go FBS. If you disagree, provide examples from schools that have jumped. I provided 5 that didn't add 22.